Skip to content
Subscribe Suscribir
Follow

Geoengineering Monitor

  • Home
    • Who we are
    • Subscribe
  • What is geoengineering?
    • Geoengineering 101
    • Technologies
  • Reasons to Oppose
    • Four Reasons to Oppose
    • Actions & Resistance
    • Chemtrails: Distrust Drives Speculation
  • Resources
  • Get Involved

Category: BECCS

Capturing CO2 from bioenergy applications (e.g. ethanol production or burning biomass for electricity) and subsequently sequestering that CO2 through either CCS or CCUS. The theory is that BECCS is “carbon negative” because bioenergy is theoretically “carbon neutral,” based on the idea that plants will regrow to fix the carbon that has been emitted. Many critics say this overlooks emissions from land use change and life cycle emissions.

Dec 8 2014

The Myth of Net-Zero Emissions

Nov 11 2014

“Uncertainties” is an understatement when it comes to BECCS

Apr 22 2014

Intergovernmental Climate Report Leaves Hopes Hanging on Fantasy Technology

Dec 6 2013

Geoengineering The Sky is Not ‘Normal’

Aug 9 2013

Science or propaganda? New hype about Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage

Jun 11 2013

Tree plantations and bioenergy with carbon capture: far from “safe” geoengineering

Posts navigation

Newer posts

Recent Posts

  • By prohibiting solar geoengineering experiments, Mexico sets a global example of precaution
  • Over 80 civil society organizations call on CBD COP15 to reinforce precaution against geoengineering to protect biodiversity and communities
  • CBD COP15 needs to reinforce precaution against geoengineering to protect biodiversity and communities
  • The current state of CCS in the U.S – Résumé after 100 years of CO2 capture and 25 years of extensive federal funding
  • PRESS CONFERENCE: HOME Alliance says no to ‘removals’ and geoengineering in UNFCCC Article 6.4

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter
Geoengineering Monitor is a joint project of Biofuelwatch and ETC Group, with support from Heinrich Boell Foundation.