Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage
Land-based geoengineering under the spotlight as the “bioeconomy” COP looms
Grassroots victory over California wood pellet export scheme shows folly of burning biomass to capture carbon
Stockholm Exergi’s BECCS project under scrutiny: Climate solution or costly gamble?
UN climate talks could undermine precaution on geoengineering called for by the biodiversity convention
BECCS carbon credit sales hit record levels despite increasing environmental and economic concerns
UK government rubber stamps Drax’s first-of-a-kind BECCS scheme, then proposes subsidies for business-as-usual biomass burning
Geoengineering Map Update: Carbon markets are a major driver for geoengineering
Geoengineering projects in Africa intensify along with oil and gas expansion
Increased funds for Geoengineering – Quarterly Review III (part 1)
Geoengineering Updates: Quarterly Review II 2022
Immense additional fossil fuel extraction and rising climate-relevant emissions from geoengineering projects in Asia
Current political and private sector influences on geoengineering projects in the EU
QUARTERLY REVIEW #3: Biomass developments in 2021
QUARTERLY REVIEW #3: DAC & CCUS developments in 2021
Geoengineering activities in Latin America
Updates on Bio-energy with Carbon Capture and Storage and Direct Air Capture (QUARTERLY #4, PART 2)
Deceptive California Climate Bill Pushes Geoengineering
Carbon capture is the fossil fuel giants’ plan to keep extracting
Policymakers Shouldn’t Trust Drax’s Bizarre Tree-Burning Climate Solution
Fire and Plantations in Portugal
Land-based geoengineering: a technofix for the climate? (Video)
Negative CO2 emissions cannot replace rapid reductions
