Burying biomass: Neocolonial resource exploitation behind “carbon dioxide removal” projects in NamibiaSep 30, 2026
Research Exposes How California Plans to Expand Reliance on Speculative Climate TechnologiesSep 24, 2026
Dry Streams in an Ocean of Eucalyptus: new investigation looks at Aperam BioEnergia’s charcoal and biochar productionSep 21, 2026
Locals aren’t buying Aperam’s rhetoric on green steel, sustainable forests and carbon removalSep 21, 2026
Carbon Dioxide Removal and the Controversy over Science and Equity at the Bonn Climate TalksAug 20, 2026
Rivers, bays, oceans: Marine and freshwater environments at risk from carbon removal companies that are altering water chemistryJul 7, 2026
Artificially fertilising the ocean in order to sink carbon as a climate solution is gathering momentumJun 24, 2026
How does it feel? Reflections on a community’s struggle to protect its coastline from marine geoengineeringJun 8, 2026
Weak voluntary certification and flawed carbon accounting are legitimising the biochar boomMay 28, 2026
Geoengineering the stratosphere: Funding for high-altitude geoengineering research is increasing massively Feb 23, 2026
Brazil’s GE eucalyptus boom shows how land-based geoengineering—marketed as climate mitigation—reproduces colonial, ecological, and social harmsFeb 4, 2026
Entrenching a new era of climate colonialism: Carbon Dioxide Removal, carbon markets and Nature Based Solutions at COP30Nov 7, 2025
Grassroots victory over California wood pellet export scheme shows folly of burning biomass to capture carbonJul 22, 2025
BECCS carbon credit sales hit record levels despite increasing environmental and economic concernsNov 6, 2024
Geoengineering decision one of a small number of positives from otherwise frustrating UN Biodiversity ConventionNov 5, 2024
Global Southwashing: How The Degrees Initiative is imposing its solar geoengineering agenda onto climate research in the Global SouthOct 16, 2024