Category: Negative Emissions

Dec 9 2021

Carbon Capture or Captured Futures? New Report From Biofuelwatch on California Climate Politics

Oct 28 2021

Carbfix and Climeworks’ large-scale plans to capture CO2 and inject it into basalt formations in Iceland involve high consumption of scarce resources and potential risks

Apr 11 2021

Enhanced Photosynthesis (Technology Briefing)

Apr 9 2021

Biochar (technology briefing)

Dec 29 2020

Updates on Weather Modifications and other Technologies (Quarterly #4, Part 3)

Aug 20 2020

Synthetic Fuels, Capture Pledges and Other Updates (Quarterly #2)

Aug 18 2020

Marine Geoengineering, CC(U)S hubs, and Synfuels: Quarterly Update

Apr 15 2020

New Government Financing for Geoengineering (April update)

Apr 3 2020

Deceptive California Climate Bill Pushes Geoengineering

Mar 18 2020

Carbon capture is the fossil fuel giants’ plan to keep extracting

May 3 2019

Three Reports, One Story: Geoengineering is Dangerous… and Unnecessary (Webinar)

Nov 1 2018

Against Geoengineering

Nov 1 2018

Fire and Plantations in Portugal

Nov 1 2018

IPCC’s 1.5˚ report tough on overshoot, critical of geoengineering

Sep 28 2018

Jacobin’s “Utopian” Geoengineering Leads to Dystopian Sun-blocking Technologies

Sep 28 2018

Where is California’s Climate Summit Heading? Watch Arizona

Nov 9 2017

Mapping Geogengineering Projects

Oct 12 2017

The geoengineering fallacy

Oct 11 2017

Risks of large-scale biosequestration as a form of CO2 removal

Jul 6 2017

Failure of Kemper County “clean coal” plant casts more doubts on BECCS

May 10 2017

Climate Change, Smoke and Mirrors

Mar 2 2017

Pioneering coal plant with CCS isn’t viable, admits CEO

Feb 23 2017

Pulling carbon out of the air: NETS, BECCS, and CDR

Nov 23 2016

Climate Change Policy and The Super-Hero Syndrome

Nov 14 2016

Responses to: The Trouble with Negative Emissions