Skip to content
Subscribe Suscribir
Follow

Geoengineering Monitor

  • Home
    • Who we are
    • Subscribe
  • What is geoengineering?
    • Geoengineering 101
    • Technologies
  • Reasons to Oppose
    • Four Reasons to Oppose
    • Actions & Resistance
    • Chemtrails: Distrust Drives Speculation
  • Resources
  • Geoengineering Map
  • Get Involved

Category: Negative Emissions

Nov 10 2016

Using forests to curb climate change threatens human rights

Nov 8 2016

Radical Realism About Climate Change

Nov 1 2016

With Sights Set on COP22, Group Offers Roadmap for ‘Fair Future’ in Warming World

Oct 18 2016

A reliance on negative emissions technologies is locking in carbon addiction

Oct 14 2016

The trouble with negative emissions

Oct 10 2016

James Hansen on Negative Emissions: Desperately needed, but not the technofixes

Oct 5 2016

No country on Earth is taking the 2 degree climate target seriously

Sep 30 2016

More funding being made available for negative emissions nonsense

Aug 5 2016

Artificial leaf turns carbon dioxide back into carbon dioxide – and this is somehow helping to fight climate change?

Jul 12 2016

Miserable failure at Kemper “clean coal” plant indicates future failure of “clean bioenergy” climate solution

Jun 29 2016

We Can’t Count on Geoengineering to Save Us From Climate Change, Scientists Warn

Posts navigation

Newer posts

Recent Posts

  • Thoughts on AMCEN’s decision at the 19th Session on Geoengineering Technologies
  • Does the Overshoot Commission’s latest report open a door to risky Solar Geoengineering?
  • Growing concerns about Biochar safety and carbon markets
  • CCS and DAC continue to fail to deliver despite over a century of R&D
  • Venture capital and carbon credits fuel an explosion of marine geoengineering projects

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter
Geoengineering Monitor is a joint project of Biofuelwatch and ETC Group, with support from Heinrich Boell Foundation.
Cleantalk Pixel